Has Sociology a Moral Basis?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Has Richard Rorty a moral philosophy?
در این مقاله سعی دارم نشان دهم که رورتی هرچند همانند کانت فیلسوف اخلاق محسوب نمیشود، ولی با این حال فلسفۀ اخلاقی دارد که باید آن را جدی گرفت. رورتی به نحو نظاممند با مسائل اخلاقی درگیر نمیشود آنطور که فیلسوفان مدرن و معاصر درگیرند. این مقاله دو بخش دارد: بخش نخست با مبانی فلسفۀ رورتی مثل ضد ماهیت باوری، داروینگرایی، فرویدگرایی و تاریخگرایی سروکار دارد. بخش دوم که تا حدودی مفصل است، بسیاری ...
متن کاملhas richard rorty a moral philosophy?
i try to show that richard rorty, although is not a moral philosopher like kant, nerveless, has moral philosophy that must be taken seriously. rorty was not engaged with moral philosophy in the systematic manner common among leading modern and contemporary moral philosophers. this paper has two parts: first part, in brief, is concerned with principles of his philosophy such as anti-essentialism...
متن کاملMoral Vegetarianism from a Very Broad Basis
Th is paper defends a qualifi ed version of moral vegetarianism. It defends a weak thesis and, more tentatively, a strong thesis, both from a very broad basis that assumes neither that animals have rights nor that they are entitled to equal consideration. Th e essay’s only assumption about moral status, an assumption defended in the analysis of the wrongness of cruelty to animals, is that senti...
متن کاملThe Non-moral Basis of Cognitive Biases of Moral Intuitions
Against moral intuitionism, which holds that moral intuitions can be non-inferentially justified, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong argues that moral intuitions are unreliable and must be confirmed to be justified (i.e. must be justified inferentially) because they are subject to cognitive biases. However, I suggest this is merely a renewed version of the argument from disagreement against intuitionism....
متن کاملNeural basis of moral verdict and moral deliberation.
How people judge something to be morally right or wrong is a fundamental question of both the sciences and the humanities. Here we aim to identify the neural processes that underlie the specific conclusion that something is morally wrong. To do this, we introduce a novel distinction between "moral deliberation," or the weighing of moral considerations, and the formation of a "moral verdict," or...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The International Journal of Ethics
سال: 1907
ISSN: 1526-422X
DOI: 10.1086/intejethi.17.4.2376331